Embracing Change : Work and Life
The bedrock of a harmonious family unit, characterized by its cohesive existence, rests upon three foundational principles:(1) unconditional and unwavering mutual respect (2) equality in terms of mutually empathetic care and (3) willingness to provide rightful support to one another. As family members grow and become mature, their need for self-expression increases, encompassing both physical (spatial and resource-related) and emotional or relationship dimensions. This inclination may arise due to the mounting activities revolving around them, necessitating more touchpoints for discussions and interactions. The relationships and communication between them, become more multi-purpose (complex), interactive and intense. It could also stem from the realization that, with growth, more pivotal and individual decisions are at stake but these decisions may profoundly influence other. These decisions become complex as they extend beyond the trivial matters like decisions about selecting a school or college or a movie or a restaurant and start delving into weightier considerations such as life, companions, business investments, asset management, and need intelligence and ethical value system, for systematically resolving conflicts between them. The family converges within a shared dwelling, the cohesiveness of which is shaped by the unit’s resourcefulness. As it progresses, it naturally seeks increased resources, space, seclusion, autonomy, and exclusiveness. However, if the physical space or the concept of exclusivity is heedlessly trespassed upon through unilaterally weighted decisions that prioritize one individual’s desires or emotions over another’s, it has the potential to hinder the advancement and psychological growth of one member. This situation arises when one member capitalizes unfairly on the vulnerabilities of another—perhaps because of their age, decisiveness, sensitivity, or nurturing disposition. Gradually, an imbalance may emerge wherein one family member, who is comparatively more sensitive individual (less resourceful or more dependent), starts to get under undue dominance of others, altering the dynamics of the relationship. This inequality in how sensitivities are treated within the family dynamics signify how healthy the unit can y stay unified. The inequality in addressing each other other’s vulnerabilities or demand or issues is acceptable if it is founded in a mutual respect and sensitivity to one another’s needs, rather than originating exclusively from the asymmetrical command and control over the limited resources, at any given time. Resourcefulness tends to evolve over time, influenced by factors such as increasing earnings as more family members contribute or the primary earner’s growing income. Even if the trajectory of resourcefulness is heading downwards at times, leading to reduced resources – financial or otherwise, a family can still sustain its unity if an environment of unconditional respect and equal sensitivity prevails. The core principle should be that no individual’s needs perpetually supersede another’s, nor should dominance be exercised without regard for the legitimate needs of others. Imagine a scenario where two family members have their separate spaces for functioning. However, one of them consistently exerts dominance over the other, continually intruding into the latter’s personal spaces and privacy without seeking permission. These intrusions are made unilaterally, driven by the dominating individual’s behavior. The more sensitive member might tolerate this dominant behavior initially, although it subtly conveys that such behavior is unwelcome and should not recur. Despite these gentle expressions of discontent and feedback, the dominant behavior persists and repeats. This consistent repetition of the dominating behavior has a detrimental impact on the relationship between these two individuals, leading to degradation on two fronts. Firstly, the person in the dominant role starts taking the other person’s emotions and sensitivities for granted. Secondly, the individual who is silenced and unheard begins to be perceived as weak, lacking sensitivity, and undeserving of respect. Consequently, as the continuous feedback and requests go ignored, the individual who feels sidelined will eventually reach a point where they become forceful and outspoken. This shift in behavior stems from the hope that through a loud outburst, their feelings and concerns will finally receive the attention they deserve. At any given juncture, if the less assertive individual (one who is sensitive or emotional) remains quiet, it does not necessarily signify contentment with the prevailing dominant behavior. This person might not consistently exhibit loudness or aggressiveness. In certain instances, they may view the other person’s dominance as something they can endure within their tolerance threshold. Alternatively, this individual might actively work on cultivating tolerance, hoping that the dominating person will eventually transform for the better, either through their own accord or over time. When individual sensitivities are treated unequally and respect fades away from the relationship, the dearth of resources can trigger a potent negative compounding effect on both parties involved. Daily existence can transform into a distressing ordeal, particularly for those who have consistently demonstrated care and sensitivity. This holds true for those who continually surrender their personal space, extend forgiveness, and offer understanding. These individuals are taken for granted, and their contributions become conditional, corroding the very essence of respect within the family dynamic. The relationship is left bereft of its intrinsic value. Even the fundamental roles within the family, such as that of a “father,” lose their inherent respect. Love, affection, and protection similarly transform into conditional aspects, inflicting the greatest deprivation upon the weaker, sensitive member of the family. Family relationships metamorphose into something like a commercial or corporate structure, adorned with superficial labels and taglines (of relationships and significance for each other as team but each one is separate part in the system and easily disposable). Imagine a scenario where family members resort to written communication, as listening and direct conversations are no longer feasible due to the absence of mutual respect. They can no longer converse openly or honestly. Instead, they resort to loud confrontations, challenging decisions before guests, domestic staff, or helpers. Sarcasm replaces sincerity in interactions with relatives or neighbors. Tolerance dwindles, and relationships become transactional and strained. The family, in such circumstances, loses its equilibrium and unity. It disintegrates, shedding the rhythm of a harmonious whole. It morphs into a gathering of individuals embroiled in daily conflicts over minor matters due to their growing intolerance towards









